Jump to content

DeWalt changed cells in 36v batteries


Aprelia

Recommended Posts

Wow, what a surprise! I thought I was being safe with my 36v line but nope! The new 2011 batteries have Samsung IFR18650-11P or -11Q cells.

I just took my 2011 battery apart and it's 10s2p (20 cells inside!) config with 18650 cells. The good thing that they are still iron phosphate and they are also 1.1 Ah cells, which yields 2.2Ah battery, compared to A123's 2.3 Ah battery. They are labelled as 79Wh batteries, confirming 79/36 = 2.2 Ah. That's right, new battery has LOWER capacity.

0.5C charge rate for 11P hints that they are something like 10A cells and most likely have shitty cycle life (sub 800 cycles).

11P cells here:

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1434825

Specs:

http://www.samsungsdi.com/battery/cylindrical-IFR18650-11P.jsp

11Q cells, the only info on the net:

http://certificates.iecee.org/cbtestcert/cbtestcert.nsf/b14e6aaf6eebab3dc12575690033e95c/c1c25de1f1b262d2c1257849000019dc?OpenDocument

So, here we go, cheapen the batteries again.

I just went from avid fan and promoter to disgusted customer. They didn't bother to change the model number which AFAIK breaks a bunch of regulations (UL/ULC for one!) and cheats the customer of some battery capacity. Good thing I have my stash of 12-some A123 based batteries which are still happily chugging away from 2006. I'm sure the next iteration of batteries will come those solar garden light 600 Mah NiCd cells, LOL.

Well, as a consumer I feel shat on by a big corporation. Those for you who work for dewalt, please pass it on that not all their customers are dumb and ignorant hammer swingers, and actually research tools before stocking the fleet with thousands of dollars of tools. My company is growing, and Milwakee with their Sanyo cells starts looking incredibly sexy.

Sad day for me today.

pumel.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the thread..... I am looking at alternative 36v tools. They may cost more but with 3.8mah batteries I can see why.

I am truly upset at Black and Decker.... I mean Dewalt. This may however mean they will produce xrp 36v in the future.

$200 a battery then...

And I just bought a 36v impact and the sds drill with a total of 4 batteries. I cant believe this crap. I used to brag about the runtime and power of this line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, everyone else has been doing it. Milwaukee changed the batteries 3 different times in the M line by my count, before they launched "RedLithium" which makes 4 changes. Ridgid, Ryobi, and Bosch have all made changes without any notice what-so-ever.

Yeah I understand everyone else has been doing it.... Lots of Idealists use this as an excuse. However Dewalt was already using the best batteries available. It was not as if they where looking for something to improve upon like the other companies mentioned.

I took pride in knowing that I was using Dewalt tools as I was under the impression that they as a company continued to do the same, that is took pride in manufacturing to the highest standards. I had no problem paying extra to a get a tool that was a step above the rest. To see the compromising of standards to make $20-30 a battery means they are now in it for the short term. Obviously the 36v batterys where lasting to long with the original a123 cells.......

I guess I can blame it on the economy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Must admitt that I also think it is very bad if dewalt now uses battery cells with less performance and quality. However, no real test have been done that can confirm that the new batterypack is of much lesser quality and performance. Maybee they are just as good as the old A123 cells.

However, if Aprelia is right this is a pitty. I thought that most powertool makers tried to make better and better batterypack, not going the opposite direction.

But acording to Aprelia also the new cells are some kind of iron phosfate cells so maybee you can have as many cycles as on the A123 cells.

Madtech or Kjones might have something to add about this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, everyone else has been doing it. Milwaukee changed the batteries 3 different times in the M line by my count, before they launched "RedLithium" which makes 4 changes. Ridgid, Ryobi, and Bosch have all made changes without any notice what-so-ever.

Every change the new cells had higher capacity and higher discharge current and cycle life - they IMPROVED batteries. This does not fall under US "consumer fraud" regulations. It might violate UL but not consumer protection laws. Dewalt on the other hand used shittier cells, that already smells like class action lawsuit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, that sucks.  i took pride in my tools knowing they were using the best battery technology available.  and now to secretly switch cells to a lower quality is bullsh*t.

maybe dewalt wants users to be buying new batteries every year or two like the old crappy 18v nicads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, so i had bought a few 36 volt batteries recently, and all were made in 2010.  and what do you know, two of them have the samsung cells.  when i had bought these, i had marked one of those two, since i thought it didnt have as much power as i thought it should.  i then figured i'd see how the new batteries performed after a few charge cycles.  well now i know why i thought that battery was weaker.

it seems dewalt changed cells somewhere between the 22nd and 30th week of 2010.  you can also see that the top number format is now different on the batteries with the samsung cells. 

i really want to hear what dewalt has to say about this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we need is much exposure of this to the public.

I have already started notifying all my fellow contractors as to what they are up to. I halted my purchase of the 36v jigsaw and cutoff tool until I can check the 4 batteries I ordered. If they are a123 than I know they can last me the life of the tool, if they are samsung or sanyo I will be shopping around.

This is already hurting sales. Is Dewalt listening yet? Probably not, but as soon as people catch wind that competitors are pulling away it will be over. Maybe I should go with Craftsman, I cant believe it... :'(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Framer, will you post up some additional information comparing battery runtime and power. Maybe do a few test's and see if you really have less power using the Samsung cells, vs 123 cells. Maybe do some cross-cut's with each battery and see which one does more cut's than the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Framer, will you post up some additional information comparing battery runtime and power. Maybe do a few test's and see if you really have less power using the Samsung cells, vs 123 cells. Maybe do some cross-cut's with each battery and see which one does more cut's than the other.

Excellent Idea....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Framer, will you post up some additional information comparing battery runtime and power. Maybe do a few test's and see if you really have less power using the Samsung cells, vs 123 cells. Maybe do some cross-cut's with each battery and see which one does more cut's than the other.

sounds like a good idea.  i'll see what i can come up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best you can do is charge them both at the same time and leave them on the chargers overnight.

Then take a 4x4 and a 3/4" auger bit and drill repeatedly without letting go of the trigger. Let the bit pull itself into the wood, don't push the drill down. Then note the number of holes for each battery. Repeat several times if possible to get an average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Any testing done thus far?

Well so far so good I was able to get almost identical results with a 2011 production battery and a 2006 a123 celled battery that had been used a around a dozen times its whole life. I got 87 cuts with the a123 and I got 85 with the 2011 run which I assume is Sanyo. And to be fair I bound the sanyo battery cuts 3 times to the point that the blade was slipping, this amounts to tremendous current draw and I did not do this once with the a123 pack run.

I cut full depth passes through a full dimension 4x6 redwood. It had a little surface dirt and I used the 2011 battery last, this means it had a duller blade and required more effort to cut. I noticed halfway through cutting that the 2011 battery seemed to actually be picking up more grunt and then around the 80th cut I could notice slowdown, much like the a123 but more noticeable. Upon throwing them on the charger the a123 being the first battery was cooler and the second light on the charger came on quicker followed by the still warm 2011, which followed 2 1/2 minutes behind.

This test absolutely sucked as I tried to keep the saw running the whole time and close to 180 full dimension cuts with one hand take there toll.... :-\ I did not have a self feeding drill bit to do this test, I cant believe it. I guess I have just muscled all my bore holes. ;D

Some Dewalt .orn, safe for work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So maybe all this wining about the change isn't so bad after all? Only time will tell.... (Cycle Life)

I appreciate you doing those test's! I know testing tools can be a pain!

Yes the batteries perform near identical, with the slow down occurring more pronounced with the Sanyo cells but they continue to operate. It is obvious that they provide less current at around 90% of their duty cycle, around 5% from me estimates. Not really an issue, but life cycle will certainly be interesting as the newer batteries appear to have a tougher time keeping up as voltage decreases.

Bottom line is I will not be abandoning my 36v and in fact I just bought the grinder and jigsaw after seeing the results of this test first hand...... ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind these are 33v packs, so if it's really 79 watt hours then it's more than the previous packs.

What the phuck are you talking about??? Both are 3.6 V *charged cells, A123 is 2.3 Ah and Samsung is 2.2 Ah (if that). A123 has higher energy density.

If a 6 year old battery (at this point shelf life takes it's toll, not just cyclles) performs the same as a brand new one, then you have a problem. Another question is how good is the shelf life in those samsungs?

EDIT: 3.6v in fully charged

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Member Statistics

    18,156
    Total Members
    6,555
    Most Online
    Ballen1114
    Newest Member
    Ballen1114
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...