Bremon
-
Posts
2,696 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
38
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Bremon
-
-
The Fuel has the wrap-around rubber, the entire brushed line up has the lightning bolt cutout. These models aren't Fuel models, and are replacements for the more basic brushed models so have the same basic casing. My thoughts anyway.
-
The 1/4" hex is 1600 inch pounds. 133 ft lbs. It's the 3/8 anvil that's 200 ft lbs. With 3 speeds it works quite well. The 2750 is 125 ft lbs with no speed selector, so you'll just have to feather the trigger a little more on lighter applications.
-
Yeah it seems like a great set. Been debating 2402 or 2403 but this drill might be a better fit;
compact/short and still lighter than the 2604, which sometimes is more than I'd like to lug around for small tasks.
-
From what I can tell the difference between the brushless and Fuel is apparently the Fuel has more rugged construction. The Fuel impact has multiple torque settings. The drill driver for Fuel has the collar switch between drill and drive versus drill being on the same selector as the clutch setting. The hammer drill I'm not sure.
I do like the size of the 2701. It's shorter than the 2403. Has me waiting on m12 vs compact m18 for a second drill.
-
If I ever need more than what I use my hammer drill for, I would definitely get the 1 1/8 over the 1". More power for not much more money.
Especially since the m12 fuel might find its way into your kit, you'll have both ends of the spectrum covered.
-
Not disappointed in the handle enough to switch. Too invested in m12 already. Just used the fuel hackzall to make a few quick cuts. Just requires a slightly different grip than the m18 to fit right in my hand.
I can agree with your sentiments about handle vs weight. Compact 18 is likely the ideal Jack-of-all-trades for weight/comfort.
-
I would love to see cordless woodworking tools from Milwaukee. Toolguyds leak about an M18 Fuel mag drill left me disappointed, selfishly, because I don't have a need for one. A trim nailer, a nice sander, etc would be more up my alley.
-
I never really noticed the handle on my m12 fuel stuff until reading this thread. All I noticed is how light it is. Took out the 2453 and 2653 last night to compare and the M18 really is much a much better grip. I still like how small and light the M12 is, but the stem packs add some bulk to the grip for sure. Thanks for pointing out the flaws with stuff I was perfectly happy with before Dwain haha.
-
I agree DR99, a trade up program could work well, and v28/m28 probably isn't common enough for there to be a lot of hurt feelings. Imagine the power of m36 fuel.
-
Well let me take my foot out of my mouth and thank you for the info. I was just earlier this week saying M28 was dead, but that I hoped they would release Fuel versions for the tradesmen that need them.Its in the current downloadable milwaukee heavy duty promo on the milwaukee uk website so I would think it's quite real.
-
Well the fact that a product page like that is popping up is encouraging but it isn't what I would consider confirmation that these tools exist.
-
I have an Arrow HT50 hammer tacker, and a basic trigger tacker. Those are all I buy for my crews at work as well. They have been basically bulletproof.
I like the belt clips on the red versions here, but they will have to be pretty close to perfection for me to fix what isn't broken.
-
Basically we are in agreement then, when I say "if the science behind the pack is sound" that pretty much qualifies that if the battery is useless half the year here in Edmonton, then the battery is trash, regardless of the amp hours.
-
As long as the build quality of the pack and science behind it is sound the higher the better I say. It all comes down to the price per amp hour for me, and right now the m18 4.0 is the sweet spot.
-
Well I'll be damned. More power and what seems to be smaller size than the M12 Fuel. Really blurring the lines through the lineup. The m12 is a bit lighter on all fronts. The compact 18v is the shortest in each case (and with the 18v compact vs fuel the difference is just 1/8" I believe), and the compact is just ever so slightly weaker than the 18v Fuel.
The compact 18v line seems like a winner. Wonder what the internals are like and what the differences between the Fuel and this brushless motor are.
-
With the recent deluge of rotary hammers I would say this is a possibility, but in general it really seems their strategy is going to a two tool line where others have heavy duty 18v, compact 18v and a 12v, Milwaukee is pushing brushless M12s as competition for other manufacturers compact 18v. This seems doubly true now with the multi voltage chargers coming in m18 kits.I'd like to see some more choices in the brushless drill area.... Maybe a Fuel compact and a heavy duty model (M18).
-
My only M12 Fuel is the 2453 impact driver and the 2521 hackzall. I'm a big believer in their brushless 12v but I don't have a need for the 1/4 or 3/8 12v impacts. 2402 will likely be my next M12.
-
I really would like a solution from them for trim. Their palm nailer doesn't fit the bill for what I want. I appreciate that they provide great solutions for electricians, plumbers, mro and hvac but I would like to see them diversify.
-
I have a pair of the fastback 2, one in the toolbox and one in the pickup. Excellent build quality, the wire loop clip works well and operating cost is low because the 100 packs of blades are extremely economical.
-
When I first wanted to buy high quality power tools I had a bias towards Makita due to friends and family, but like you, I did extensive research. Multiple videos and tool fights had the Makita coming up short, I believe TIA had the 2604 smoking a Makita. I couldn't bring myself to spend money on a name instead of performance. Looking further into the lineups of other tools it seemed Milwaukee had a ton of momentum with releases while I read about Makita battery problems and a stagnant release schedule for product. Since then I believe Dewalt and Makita have surpassed the 2604, Makitas latest looks to be a torque monster. What I really like is seeing the guys from Oz Tool Talk showing off that tiny Makita brushless impact driver, really cool little driver. What I'm trying to say in way too many words is that every manufacturer has peaks and valleys, and when you're looking to buy and aren't already invested in a battery platform, the best thing to do is go with the manufacturer who seems to be on a roll with releases that appeal to you. Makita has their battery situation figured out and looks to be putting out some top notch tools, in addition to already having a huge lineup. If I was in the market earlier than I was I likely would have ended up with Dewalt due to Milwaukee playing musical chairs with battery platforms for example, if I was looking now I'd definitely take a serious look at Makita. Now that Makita has raised the bar I'm sure you'll see more tool fights and reviews with them involved.Also on tools in actions YouTube page they seem to review a broad amount of brands and tools but I don't see hardly any reviews for the many makita products, specifically any of the ones I would be getting. Any reason for this?
-
I don't have experience with all these tools specifically but I do own the 2604 and 2653. The Fuel impact driver is probably my most widely used tool and I would recommend it to anyone. I've installed a decent amount of tapcons drilling with the 2604 and it works well enough, but is no match for a dedicated SDS imo.
I also know the feeling of wanting the best so I know the feeling of hesitation you have towards the brushed SDS from Milwaukee but it really depends on how much you'll use it. I rarely need to install anchors at work and basically never outside of work so that wouldn't stop me from going with Mikwaukee.
Bosch, from what I know, has a sterling reputation with regards to drilling concrete. I only have experience with a corded Bosch rotary hammer but it was a good experience. I'm sure their latest brushless SDS is fantastic.
My only experience with cordless Makita is a friends kit that he really likes. The idea of the 2x18 tools for more power is very appealing but I wouldn't want to have a limited supply of batteries if I'm draining two simulateously. From what I've heard the Makitas charge very quickly though, and 4 batteries could be sufficient.
Sorry to not push you firmly in one direction but hopefully its some food for thought.
-
Just checking back in (yes, it's been a while). I just wanted to thank you guys for the advice. I'm very happy with the capabilities of this impact. Build quality is what you would expect of the Fuel line, and even though it weighs almost twice as much as my Fuel impact driver, it's well balanced and comfortable in the hand. I also got the protective boot thrown in with the purchase so the value aspect of the kit weighed in the 2763s favour. The 2654 is still a possibility in the future but big red has other tempting products coming out that may be a bit more of a priority. Thanks again everyone.
-
I would say it has less to do with fascism and more to do with comparing it to units that are similar in size or price. Comparing it to the full-size Fuel doesn't do anyone any favors because they have different niches, similar to the 12v Fuel drills being compared commonly to compact 18v instead of the big buggers. This marketing is aimed at size, price points, and the work cycle expected of them.
-
Looking forward to some reviews of this little vac, even though I'm guaranteed to end up buying it. Only bought the M18 a few months ago but as always more can be justified.
Milwaukee 2731-20 M18 FUEL 7-1/4" Circular Saw
in Milwaukee
Posted
I don't have the 7.25" so you can take my opinion with a grain of salt, but I do have the 2730 6.5". If I had my way, I would have the larger saw.
Despite being blade-right, it's more capable, blades are cheaper, and the weight difference is negligible. The redeeming factor for my 6.5 was it was free with my 2604-22 kit. Well, that, and it is still a great saw, the 2731 just seems better (2731 and 2530 would be my ideal combo).