Jump to content

Jjwillac

Members
  • Posts

    78
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Jjwillac

  1. The XDT16 definitely has perks, and if you could find it that cheap then why not go with it, but I'd research the vendor VERY well at a price like that.  I got my XDT16 for $125 and thought it was a steal... 

     

    Everyone is going to value specific features differently and it might be those perks matter for what you're planning to be doing. I treat the two as 90% interchangeable. I do wish they all had 2 leds. As for power, all of Makita's top line brushless impacts fare better in head to heads than their paper specs suggest they should. 

     

     

  2. On 2/16/2020 at 5:31 PM, Jronman said:

    basically a tool that has been optimized to use 21700 cell batteries.

    Specifically, the tool knows whether the battery is using 21700 cells and adjusts performance to suit.  So, the stated specs only apply if a battery with 21700 cells is used and the tool self limits with other batteries. 

  3. 2 hours ago, Tools & Stuff said:

    If you value all the things you say in the last line of your post then you want the xtd16. Simple. You won't regret it.

    The XDT16 is great, but I don't think it's the only Makita impact that meets those criteria. Honestly, I'd say the XDT14, XDT12, and XDT16 are pretty similar in each of those categories. The XDT14 is our go to impact; 90% of the features and frequently discounted (a local dealer had them for $80 over the holidays). 

  4. My father in law has a dewalt 15ga and has had a lot of trouble with jamming and proud nails. Recently it got so bad he actually picked up the ryobi to finish a job. I recently got the Milwaukee 16ga angled and have been generally happy; comfortable, no jams, plenty of power, and fast; but the depth adjustment seems very sensitive and I have to fiddle with it more than I'd like to get good sets in a variety of materials. 

  5. So looking at this again, specifically the number (32) and arrangement of cells. What would be the voltage and ah on this? The connection appears to be XGT, but the cell count doesn't seem to work with 40V? I might just be missing something?

  6. 3 hours ago, Biggie said:

    Interesting... looks like they're stepping up their game on the compact impact wrench.  I think this is a good thing but it doesn't really look like a mid torque.  

    My sentiment exactly...this seems like a very odd choice for a new impact wrench. As far as I can tell they would fill the exact same niche as the existing XWT11? The extra 30 ft-lbs is really negligable.

  7. After QuasarCZ's recent posts on the soon to be released compact impact wrenches and 9 ¼ circular saw I thought others might be interested in the 2020 product catalog.  Many of the "new" tools have been widely reported on already, but there were a few that I hadn't seen. There is also some additional XGT info.  What do you see that sparks your interest? Anything you're really disappointed isn't included (e.g., table saw, brushless multitool, X2 router, and belt sanders)?

    5e16e26f6b010.pdf

    • Like 1
  8. I'm in the market for a mid-torque impact wrench to replace a Milwaukee 2860-20 that met an untimely death. The Milwaukee did everything I needed, but most of my tools are Makita and I really like my Makita XMT08 high-torque impact, so I took a look at the Makita mid-torque options.  Surprisingly, it seems there really isn't a brushless mid-torque option? The XWT11 I've used is under-powered (210 ft lbs) and slow.  Am I missing something? 

  9. Out of curiosity, why replace everything you already have? Why not just supplement with, or gradually transition to, Milwaukee? I have both and for most tools, either brand would be fine for 90% of my needs.  I personally lean toward Makita; to me, Makita tools often have a higher quality feel, better design (with many notable exceptions), and I've had fewer issues with the tools.  Also, X2 is a wonderful system.  Unless you are in a particular trade, I doubt you could go wrong with either, but I also don't see how it could be necessary, practical, or economical to switch entirely from one to the other.

    • Like 1
  10. 1 hour ago, Mordekyle said:

     

     


    I don’t think it’s clear to anyone else.

    Why would the govt need to overreach?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

     

     

    I was wondering the same...

     

    As for the batteries, I am not particularly concerned with the lack of bigger batteries; yeah, longer run time would be nice with some tools (e.g., grinders, x2 blower, trimmer, and sds max), but I have enough batteries and chargers to cycle and in my applications that isn't a huge inconvenience.  It might be for other users. However, I would like to see 21700 batteries for the increased performance potential and compactness, but only if they are able to ensure the added draw doesn't add excessive wear on the batteries or tools. These might not function with all current X2 tools, but I'd pay that price.

  11. 33 minutes ago, Fireguy116 said:

    Sorry to revive an old thread. But I would assume Makita is not at this point going to release any new batteries for their 18v line with the new 40v system coming soon. I’m actually concerned that the 18v line will get left behind for the 40v system. 

    Makita has repeatedly stated they are committed to the 18V LXT line, including X2, and that the XGT 40V is in no way a replacement. They are continuing to release and develop tools in these lines. That doesn't mean they will develop larger 18V batteries, it is a completely different question, but at least it seems XGT won't be the reason for that? 

     

    The way I see it, XGT could either dampen development of higher performance LXT tools (think next generation of premium hammer drill or rear-handle saw) or facilitate such development if XGT tech trickles down to LXT.  Hopefully the latter.  What do others think?

×
×
  • Create New...